Difference between revisions of "Coolness scale"
From Eth0Wiki
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* [http://www.realmanmag.com/images/Chickswithguns2.jpg weapons grade] | * [http://www.realmanmag.com/images/Chickswithguns2.jpg weapons grade] | ||
* [http://www.vanriet.com/mt/archives/images/january_img/nuns_with_guns_big.jpg Biblically] ([http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Jesus_gun2.jpg]) | * [http://www.vanriet.com/mt/archives/images/january_img/nuns_with_guns_big.jpg Biblically] ([http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Jesus_gun2.jpg]) | ||
| + | * OMGWTF[[LackRack|LACK]] | ||
Obviously some can also be used in a negated manner, Weapons grade Fail is worse than Epic fail. | Obviously some can also be used in a negated manner, Weapons grade Fail is worse than Epic fail. | ||
Revision as of 23:17, 18 January 2010
How to rate coolness and other scientific metrics
From uncool to cool:
- omg, nuke it from orbit!
- kill it with fire
- pwnd
- do not want
- noes
- meh
- neutral
- shiny
- FTW
- Epic
- weapons grade
- Biblically ([1])
- OMGWTFLACK
Obviously some can also be used in a negated manner, Weapons grade Fail is worse than Epic fail.
![[1]](http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Jesus_gun2.jpg){kind=link}