Personal tools

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Eth0Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
   makes no sense at all. Agnostic however exactly covers what you are trying to say: that one cannot say one particular OS
 
   makes no sense at all. Agnostic however exactly covers what you are trying to say: that one cannot say one particular OS
 
   is best.
 
   is best.
 +
- Somewhat Atheist is correct, an atheist denies there a a need of choice for an specific OS. [--[[User:Zircon|Zircon]] 23:07, 14 January 2008 (CET)Zircon]

Revision as of 22:07, 14 January 2008

ETH0.jpg

Ideas for ETH0

Here we can post and discuss ideas for the august event

  • VOIP Network for all visitors including a number list on the intranet. Guests can either use a softphone or a hardphone to communicate.
- why not ask eventphone.de to come set it up? DECT ftw :)
- we're problably too late now and they cost... maybe in 2009?
  • Wireless Mesh network
  • Familyvillage with kindergarten (like WTH and CCC)
  • Campshop with general camping supplies
  • IT/Game market
  • Atheist village for people who couldn't care less about the os of choice. (as long as it fits the purpose)
- Atheist? I think you mean "agnostic". Atheists are sure there is no god, agnostics say you 
  cannot be sure what is best (be it god, OS or BOFH)
- While some people treat OS'ses as god, it can be seen as atheist imho
- certainly, but "atheist" means certainty there is no god. The computing equivalent would be certainty there is no OS. That
  makes no sense at all. Agnostic however exactly covers what you are trying to say: that one cannot say one particular OS
  is best.
- Somewhat Atheist is correct, an atheist denies there a a need of choice for an specific OS. [--Zircon 23:07, 14 January 2008 (CET)Zircon]